Saturday, December 14, 2013

In the belly of the beast

 
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2013 10:52 AM
Subject: In the belly of the beast
 

IN THE BELLY OF THE BEAST
 
 
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 10:14 PM
 
Subject: In the belly of the beast
 
 
 
Greetings Rollingstone et al,
 
 
in reply to IN THE BELLY OF THE BEAST, I would like to comment please. I have been investigating this for over a decade daily, i.e. the infamous MAD COW FEED BAN IN THE USA, and Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy BSE aka Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy TSE prion disease. I dedicate this to my mother, whom in 1997 died from confirmed Heidenhain Variant Creutzfeldt Jakob Disease hvCJD confirmed DOD December 14, 1997, 16 years ago today.
just made a promise to her back then, never forget, and never let them forget. my mom did everything Linda Blair did in the movie the exorcist, except spin her head 360 degress, she jerked so bad, it too 3 adults to hold her down while screaming what’s wrong with me, what’s wrong with me, why can’t I stop this. but they said mad cow disease was not here in the USA, that it just happens spontaneously in 85%+ of all human TSE i.e. the sporadic CJD’s. well, there was mad cow disease in the USA, this proven now, and not just the typical mad cow disease, but also, the atypical strains. also, Chronic Wasting Disease CWD in cervids, aka mad deer disease, same disease, just different species, CWD spreading with no stopping it in sight. as well, you have scrapie and the atypical scrapie (Nor-98), which has spread coast to coast in North America. ALL OF WHICH HAS BEEN RENDERED UP AND FED TO ANIMALS, FOR HUMAN AND ANIMAL CONSUMPTION. you know, there is Feline Spongiform Encephalopathy and Canine Spongiform Encephalopathy, render them up with the other dead animals for feed. if you think that mad cow feed ban of 1997 was part of a triple firewall, think again (I think .005 grams of tainted feed is lethal enough for more than one cow. ...
 
 
 
 
1 decade post mad cow feed ban ;
 
 
10,000,000+ LBS. of PROHIBITED BANNED MAD COW FEED I.E. BLOOD LACED MBM IN COMMERCE USA 2007
 
Date: March 21, 2007 at 2:27 pm PST
 
RECALLS AND FIELD CORRECTIONS: VETERINARY MEDICINES -- CLASS II
 
PRODUCT
 
Bulk cattle feed made with recalled Darling's 85% Blood Meal, Flash Dried, Recall # V-024-2007
 
CODE
 
Cattle feed delivered between 01/12/2007 and 01/26/2007
 
RECALLING FIRM/MANUFACTURER
 
Pfeiffer, Arno, Inc, Greenbush, WI. by conversation on February 5, 2007.
 
Firm initiated recall is ongoing.
 
REASON
 
Blood meal used to make cattle feed was recalled because it was cross- contaminated with prohibited bovine meat and bone meal that had been manufactured on common equipment and labeling did not bear cautionary BSE statement.
 
VOLUME OF PRODUCT IN COMMERCE
 
42,090 lbs.
 
DISTRIBUTION
 
WI
 
___________________________________
 
PRODUCT
 
Custom dairy premix products: MNM ALL PURPOSE Pellet, HILLSIDE/CDL Prot- Buffer Meal, LEE, M.-CLOSE UP PX Pellet, HIGH DESERT/ GHC LACT Meal, TATARKA, M CUST PROT Meal, SUNRIDGE/CDL PROTEIN Blend, LOURENZO, K PVM DAIRY Meal, DOUBLE B DAIRY/GHC LAC Mineral, WEST PIONT/GHC CLOSEUP Mineral, WEST POINT/GHC LACT Meal, JENKS, J/COMPASS PROTEIN Meal, COPPINI - 8# SPECIAL DAIRY Mix, GULICK, L-LACT Meal (Bulk), TRIPLE J - PROTEIN/LACTATION, ROCK CREEK/GHC MILK Mineral, BETTENCOURT/GHC S.SIDE MK-MN, BETTENCOURT #1/GHC MILK MINR, V&C DAIRY/GHC LACT Meal, VEENSTRA, F/GHC LACT Meal, SMUTNY, A- BYPASS ML W/SMARTA, Recall # V-025-2007
 
CODE
 
The firm does not utilize a code - only shipping documentation with commodity and weights identified.
 
RECALLING FIRM/MANUFACTURER
 
Rangen, Inc, Buhl, ID, by letters on February 13 and 14, 2007. Firm initiated recall is complete.
 
REASON
 
Products manufactured from bulk feed containing blood meal that was cross contaminated with prohibited meat and bone meal and the labeling did not bear cautionary BSE statement.
 
VOLUME OF PRODUCT IN COMMERCE
 
9,997,976 lbs.
 
DISTRIBUTION
 
ID and NV
 
END OF ENFORCEMENT REPORT FOR MARCH 21, 2007
 
 
 
 
 
Thursday, September 3, 2009
 
429,128 lbs. feed for ruminant animals may have been contaminated with prohibited material Recall # V-258-2009
 
 
 
 
 
 
Friday, September 4, 2009
 
FOIA REQUEST ON FEED RECALL PRODUCT 429,128 lbs. feed for ruminant animals may have been contaminated with prohibited material Recall # V-258-2009
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
 
re-FOIA REQUEST ON FEED RECALL PRODUCT contaminated with prohibited material Recall # V-258-2009 and Recall # V-256-2009
 
 
 
 
 
 
From: Terry S. Singeltary Sr.
 
To: CVMHomeP@cvm.fda.gov
 
Cc: FOIASTAFF@oig.usda.gov ; paffairs@oig.hhs.gov ; HHSTips@oig.hhs.gov ; phyllis.fong@oig.usda.gov
 
FOIA REQUEST ON FEED RECALL PRODUCT 429,128 lbs. feed for ruminant animals may have been contaminated with prohibited material Recall # V-258-2009
 
September 4, 2009
 
TO:
 
Food and Drug Administration
 
Division of Freedom of Information (HFI-35)
 
Office of Shared Services
 
Office of Public Information and Library Services
 
5600 Fishers Lane
 
Rockville, MD 20857
 
Or requests may be sent via fax to: fax number 301-443-1726 or 301-443-1719. If experience difficulty sending a fax, please call (301) 443-2414.
 
FROM:
 
Terry S. Singeltary Sr.
 
P.O. Box 42
 
Bacliff, Texas USA 77518
 
Greetings FDA FOIE, and the Honorable Phyllis Fong et al @ OIG FOIA,
 
ANOTHER FOIA REQUEST PLEASE !
 
PLEASE SEE FULL TEXT ;
 
Canine Spongiform Encephalopathy CSE TSE
 
 
 
>>> Is anybody even looking at the dogs..especially with CWD now so widespread? <<<
 
 
 
NA, na, na........they know what they will find, Canine Spongiform Encephalopathy, and it was documented, but then they decided not to push the issue anymore, they had enough mad cow disease in different species to deal with. so they screwed the brains up with dogs and deer in the UK. then we took a page or two from the UKs testing protocols and USDA screwed the brains up with cattle, again, and again, and again. then played the stupid card. ya can't fix stupid. ... TSS
 
Monday, March 8, 2010
 
Canine Spongiform Encephalopathy aka MAD DOG DISEASE
 
Greetings,
 
Another Big Myth about Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy, is that TSE will not transmit to dogs. This is simply NOT TRUE. IT is perfectly legal to feed dogs and cats here in the USA bovine meat and bone meal. Canine dementia is real. how many dogs and cats here in the USA are tested for mad cow disease ? I just received this F.O.I.A. request, and thought I would post it here with a follow up on MAD DOG DISEASE. This is a follow up with additional data I just received on a FOIA request in 2009 ;
 
see full text, and be sure to read the BSE Inquiry documents toward the bottom ;
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Monday, March 8, 2010
 
UPDATE 429,128 lbs. feed for ruminant animals may have been contaminated with prohibited material Recall # V-258-2009
 
 
 
 
 
Monday, March 1, 2010
 
ANIMAL PROTEIN I.E. MAD COW FEED IN COMMERCE A REVIEW 2010
 
 
 
 
 
snip...see more here;
 
Thursday, January 5, 2012
 
Horse Meat, slaughter for consumption USA
 
 
 
 
 
Saturday, August 4, 2012
 
*** Final Feed Investigation Summary - California BSE Case - July 2012
 
 
 
 
 
It was proven in Oprah Winfrey's trial, that Cactus Cattle feeders, sent neurologically ill cattle, some with encephalopathy stamped on the dead slips, were picked up and sent to the renders, along with sheep carcasses.
 
 
 
 
 
Web posted Friday, January 23, 1998 5:49 a.m. CT
 
Witness testifies some ill cattle sent to rendering plant
 
By CHIP CHANDLER
 
Globe-News Staff Writer
 
Witness testifies some ill cattle sent to rendering plant
 
By CHIP CHANDLER Globe-News Staff Writer
 
snip...
 
Mike Engler -- son of Paul Engler, the original plaintiff and owner of Cactus Feeders Inc. -- agreed that more than 10 cows with some sort of central nervous system disorder were sent to Hereford By-Products.
 
The younger Engler, who has a doctorate in biochemistry from Johns Hopkins University, was the only witness jurors heard Thursday in the Oprah Winfrey defamation trial. His testimony will resume this morning.
 
According to a U.S. Department of Agriculture report from which Winfrey attorney Charles Babcock quoted, encephalitis caused by unknown reasons could be a warning sign for bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or mad cow disease.
 
Encephalitis was indicated on the death certificates -- or ``dead slips'' -- of three Cactus Feeders cows discussed in court. The slips then were stamped, ``Picked up by your local used cattle dealer'' before the carcasses were taken to the rendering plant.
 
snip...
 
 
 
 
 
Web posted Wednesday, February 18, 1998 2:02 p.m. CT
 
Graphic pictures greet Winfrey jury
 
By KAY LEDBETTER Globe-News Farm and Ranch Editor
 
Pictures of sheep heads, euthanized pets and roadkill greeted jurors this morning as they returned to the continuation of the cattlemen vs. Oprah Winfrey lawsuit.
 
The lawsuit continues today in U.S. District Mary Lou Robinson's court, but in a much diminished state.
 
snip...
 
Defense lawyer Charles Babcock called Van Smith, a City Paper reporter from Baltimore who had written an article on rendering plants in September 1995.
 
Smith and Babcock went through more than 50 pictures taken as the reporter toured the Valley Proteins plant in Baltimore and followed a rendering truck to the local animal shelter, a sausage plant and a slaughterhouse.
 
The pictures showed offal being emptied from the slaughterhouses. They showed animal shelter workers in the euthanasia room; barrels of dead animals in a refrigerated room at the animal shelter; waste meat from the sausage plant; and dead sheep from the slaughterhouse.
 
 
 
 
 
Web posted Thursday, February 19, 1998 5:32 a.m. CT
 
Defense opens case
 
Cattlemen vs. Oprah Winfrey
 
By CHIP CHANDLER
 
Globe-News Staff Writer
 
snip...
 
Van Smith, a reporter with City Paper in Baltimore, testified about an article he wrote on rendering plants. Smith said he saw sheep taken to a plant despite a voluntary ban on using processed sheep in protein-enhanced feed, backing up a statement Lyman made on Winfrey's show.
 
Under cross-examination, Smith said he was not sure whether the sheep were used for feed or other animal-derived products.
 
snip...
 
Van Smith, a reporter with City Paper in Baltimore, testified about an article he wrote on rendering plants. Smith said he saw sheep taken to a plant despite a voluntary ban on using processed sheep in protein-enhanced feed, backing up a statement Lyman made on Winfrey's show.
 
Under cross-examination, Smith said he was not sure whether the sheep were used for feed or other animal-derived products.
 
 
 
 
 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Statement May 4, 2004 Media Inquiries: 301-827-6242 Consumer Inquiries: 888-INFO-FDA
 
Statement on Texas Cow With Central Nervous System Symptoms On Friday, April 30 th , the Food and Drug Administration learned that a cow with central nervous system symptoms had been killed and shipped to a processor for rendering into animal protein for use in animal feed.
 
FDA, which is responsible for the safety of animal feed, immediately began an investigation. On Friday and throughout the weekend, FDA investigators inspected the slaughterhouse, the rendering facility, the farm where the animal came from, and the processor that initially received the cow from the slaughterhouse.
 
FDA's investigation showed that the animal in question had already been rendered into "meat and bone meal" (a type of protein animal feed). Over the weekend FDA was able to track down all the implicated material. That material is being held by the firm, which is cooperating fully with FDA.
 
Cattle with central nervous system symptoms are of particular interest because cattle with bovine spongiform encephalopathy or BSE, also known as "mad cow disease," can exhibit such symptoms. In this case, there is no way now to test for BSE. But even if the cow had BSE, FDA's animal feed rule would prohibit the feeding of its rendered protein to other ruminant animals (e.g., cows, goats, sheep, bison).
 
FDA is sending a letter to the firm summarizing its findings and informing the firm that FDA will not object to use of this material in swine feed only. If it is not used in swine feed, this material will be destroyed. Pigs have been shown not to be susceptible to BSE. If the firm agrees to use the material for swine feed only, FDA will track the material all the way through the supply chain from the processor to the farm to ensure that the feed is properly monitored and used only as feed for pigs.
 
To protect the U.S. against BSE, FDA works to keep certain mammalian protein out of animal feed for cattle and other ruminant animals. FDA established its animal feed rule in 1997 after the BSE epidemic in the U.K. showed that the disease spreads by feeding infected ruminant protein to cattle.
 
Under the current regulation, the material from this Texas cow is not allowed in feed for cattle or other ruminant animals. FDA's action specifying that the material go only into swine feed means also that it will not be fed to poultry.
 
FDA is committed to protecting the U.S. from BSE and collaborates closely with the U.S. Department of Agriculture on all BSE issues. The animal feed rule provides crucial protection against the spread of BSE, but it is only one of several such firewalls. FDA will soon be improving the animal feed rule, to make this strong system even stronger.
 
####
 
 
 
 
 
 
2013
 
 
ruminant feed in the USA History, WHAT FEED BAN ???
 
 
 
 
Friday, April 19, 2013
 
FDA BSE TSE PRION NEWS FEED AND ANNUAL INSPECTION OF FEED MILLS REPORTS HAS CEASED TO EXIST
 
 
 
 
 
 
ENFORCEMENT REPORT FOR AUGUST 2, 2006
 
please note, considering .005 grams is lethal, I do not know how much of this 125 TONS of banned mad cow protein was part of the ;
 
e) "Big Jim's" BBB Deer Ration, Big Buck Blend, Recall # V-104-6;
 
bbbut, this was about 10 years post mad cow feed ban from 1997. 10 years later, and still feeding banned mad cow protein to cervids???
 
considering that .005 gram is lethal to several bovines, and we know that the oral consumption of CWD tainted products is very efficient mode of transmission of CWD.
 
Subject: MAD COW FEED RECALL AL AND FL VOLUME OF PRODUCT IN COMMERCE 125 TONS Products manufactured from 02/01/2005 until 06/06/2006
 
Date: August 6, 2006 at 6:16 pm PST
 
PRODUCT
 
a) CO-OP 32% Sinking Catfish, Recall # V-100-6;
 
b) Performance Sheep Pell W/Decox/A/N, medicated, net wt. 50 lbs, Recall # V-101-6;
 
c) Pro 40% Swine Conc Meal -- 50 lb, Recall # V-102-6;
 
d) CO-OP 32% Sinking Catfish Food Medicated, Recall # V-103-6;
 
***e) "Big Jim's" BBB Deer Ration, Big Buck Blend, Recall # V-104-6;
 
f) CO-OP 40% Hog Supplement Medicated Pelleted, Tylosin 100 grams/ton, 50 lb. bag, Recall # V-105-6;
 
g) Pig Starter Pell II, 18% W/MCDX Medicated 282020, Carbadox -- 0.0055%, Recall # V-106-6;
 
h) CO-OP STARTER-GROWER CRUMBLES, Complete Feed for Chickens from Hatch to 20 Weeks, Medicated, Bacitracin Methylene Disalicylate, 25 and 50 Lbs, Recall # V-107-6;
 
i) CO-OP LAYING PELLETS, Complete Feed for Laying Chickens, Recall # 108-6;
 
j) CO-OP LAYING CRUMBLES, Recall # V-109-6;
 
k) CO-OP QUAIL FLIGHT CONDITIONER MEDICATED, net wt 50 Lbs, Recall # V-110-6;
 
l) CO-OP QUAIL STARTER MEDICATED, Net Wt. 50 Lbs, Recall # V-111-6;
 
m) CO-OP QUAIL GROWER MEDICATED, 50 Lbs, Recall # V-112-6
 
CODE
 
Product manufactured from 02/01/2005 until 06/06/2006
 
RECALLING FIRM/MANUFACTURER
 
Alabama Farmers Cooperative, Inc., Decatur, AL, by telephone, fax, email and visit on June 9, 2006. FDA initiated recall is complete.
 
REASON
 
Animal and fish feeds which were possibly contaminated with ruminant based protein not labeled as "Do not feed to ruminants".
 
VOLUME OF PRODUCT IN COMMERCE
 
125 tons
 
DISTRIBUTION
 
AL and FL
 
END OF ENFORCEMENT REPORT FOR AUGUST 2, 2006
 
###
 
 
 
Saturday, December 15, 2012
 
Bovine spongiform encephalopathy: the effect of oral exposure dose on attack rate and incubation period in cattle -- an update 5 December 2012
 
 
 
 
 
Thursday, June 6, 2013
 
BSE TSE PRION USDA FDA MAD COW FEED COMPLIANCE REPORT and NAI, OAI, and VAI ratings as at June 5, 2013
 
 
 
 
Tuesday, June 11, 2013
 
Weld County Bi-Products dba Fort Morgan Pet Foods 6/1/12 significant deviations from requirements in FDA regulations that are intended to reduce the risk of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) within the United States
 
 
 
 
-------- Original Message --------
 
Subject: DOCKET-- 03D-0186 -- FDA Issues Draft Guidance on Use of Material From Deer and Elk in Animal Feed; Availability
 
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 11:47:37 –0500
 
From: "Terry S. Singeltary Sr."
 
To: fdadockets@oc.fda.gov
 
Greetings FDA,
 
i would kindly like to comment on; Docket 03D-0186FDA Issues Draft Guidance on Use of Material From Deer and Elk in Animal Feed; Availability Several factors on this apparent voluntary proposal disturbs me greatly, please allow me to point them out;
 
snip...
 
Oral transmission and early lymphoid tropism of chronic wasting diseasePrPres in mule deer fawns (Odocoileus hemionus ) These results indicate that CWD PrP res can be detected in lymphoid tissues draining the alimentary tract within a few weeks after oral exposure to infectious prions and may reflect the initial pathway of CWD infection in deer. The rapid infection of deer fawns following exposure by the most plausible natural route is consistent with the efficient horizontal transmission of CWD in nature and enables accelerated studies of transmission and pathogenesis in the native species.
 
snip...
 
 
 
 
now, just what is in that mad deer feed? _ANIMAL PROTEIN_
 
 
Subject: MAD DEER/ELK DISEASE AND POTENTIAL SOURCES
 
Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 18:41:46 -0700 From: "Terry S. Singeltary Sr." Reply-To: BSE-LTo: BSE-L
 
8420-20.5% Antler DeveloperFor Deer and Game in the wildGuaranteed Analysis Ingredients / Products Feeding Directions
 
snip...
 
_animal protein_
 
 
 
snip...
 
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICESPUBLIC HEALTH SERVICEFOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATIONApril 9, 2001 WARNING LETTER01-PHI-12CERTIFIED MAILRETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
 
Brian J. Raymond, Owner Sandy Lake Mills 26 Mill Street P.O. Box 117 Sandy Lake, PA 16145
 
PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT
 
Tel: 215-597-4390
 
Dear Mr. Raymond:Food and Drug Administration Investigator Gregory E. Beichner conducted an inspection of your animal feed manufacturing operation, located in Sandy Lake, Pennsylvania, on March 23,2001, and determined that your firm manufactures animal feeds including feeds containing prohibited materials. The inspection found significant deviations from the requirements set forth in Title 21, code of Federal Regulations, part 589.2000 - Animal Proteins Prohibited in Ruminant Feed. The regulation is intended to prevent the establishment and amplification of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) . Such deviations cause products being manufactured at this facility to be misbranded within the meaning of Section 403(f), of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act).Our investigation found failure to label your swine feed with the required cautionary statement "Do Not Feed to cattleor other Ruminants" The FDA suggests that the statement be distinguished by different type-size or color or other means of highlighting the statement so that it is easily noticed by a purchaser.
 
In addition, we note that you are using approximately 140 pounds of cracked corn to flush your mixer used in the manufacture of animal feeds containing prohibited material. This flushed material is fed to wild game including deer, a ruminant animal.Feed material which may potentially contain prohibited material should not be fed to ruminant animals which may become part of the food chain.The above is not intended to be an all-inclusive list of deviations fromthe regulations. As a manufacturer of materials intended for animalfeed use, you are responsible for assuring that your overall operation and the products you manufacture and distribute are in compliance withthe law. We have enclosed a copy of FDA's Small Entity Compliance Guideto assist you with complying with the regulation...
 
 
 
snip...end...full text ;
 
 
2003D-0186 Guidance for Industry: Use of Material From Deer and Elk In Animal Feed
 
EMC 1 Terry S. Singeltary Sr. Vol #: 1
 
 
 
 
 
 
see my full text submission here ;
 
 
 
Draft Guidance on Use of Material From Deer and Elk in Animal Feed; CVM Updates on Deer and Elk Withdrawn FDA Veterinarian Newsletter July/August 2003 Volume XVIII, No 4
 
FDA has announced the availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled “Use of Material from Deer and Elk in Animal Feed.” This draft guidance document (GFI #158), when finalized, will describe FDA’s current thinking regarding the use in animal feed of material from deer and elk that are positive for Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) or that are at high risk for CWD.
 
CWD is a neurological (brain) disease of farmed and wild deer and elk that belong in the cervidae animal family (cervids). Only deer and elk are known to be susceptible to CWD by natural transmission. The disease has been found in farmed and wild mule deer, white-tailed deer, North American elk, and farmed black-tailed deer. CWD belongs to a family of animal and human diseases called transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs). TSEs are very rare, but are always fatal.
 
This draft Level 1 guidance, when finalized, will represent the Agency’s current thinking on the topic. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. An alternate method may be used as long as it satisfies the requirements of applicable statutes and regulations.
 
Draft guidance #158 is posted on the FDA/Center for Veterinary Medicine Home Page. Single copies of the draft guidance may be obtained from the FDA Veterinarian.
 
- - Page Last Updated: 04/16/2013
 
 
 
 
 
CONTAINS NON-BINDING RECOMMENDATIONS
 
158
 
Guidance for Industry
 
Use of Material from Deer and Elk in Animal Feed
 
Comments and suggestions regarding the document should be submitted to Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations.gov. All comments should be identified with the Docket No. 03D-0186.
 
For questions regarding this guidance, contact Burt Pritchett, Center for Veterinary Medicine (HFV- 222), Food and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Place, Rockville, MD 20855, 240-453-6860, E-mail: burt.pritchett@fda.hhs.gov. Additional copies of this guidance document may be requested from the Communications Staff (HFV-12), Center for Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Place, Rockville, MD 20855, and may be viewed on the Internet at http://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/GuidanceforIndustry/default.htm.
 
 
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
 
Food and Drug Administration Center for Veterinary Medicine September 15, 2003
 
CONTAINS NON-BINDING RECOMMENDATIONS
 
158
 
Guidance for Industry1
 
Use of Material from Deer and Elk in Animal Feed
 
This guidance represents the Food and Drug Administration’s current thinking on the use of material from deer and elk in animal feed. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if the approach satisfies the requirements of applicable statutes or regulations. If you want to discuss an alternative approach, contact the FDA staff responsible for implementing this guidance. If you cannot identify the appropriate FDA staff, call the appropriate number listed on the title page of this guidance.
 
I. Introduction
 
FDA’s guidance documents, including this guidance, do not establish legally enforceable responsibilities. Instead, guidances describe the Agency’s current thinking on a topic and should be viewed only as recommendations, unless specific regulatory or statutory requirements are cited. The use of the word “should” in Agency guidances means that something is suggested or recommended, but not required.
 
Under FDA’s BSE feed regulation (21 CFR 589.2000) most material from deer and elk is prohibited for use in feed for ruminant animals. This guidance document describes FDA’s recommendations regarding the use in all animal feed of all material from deer and elk that are positive for Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) or are considered at high risk for CWD. The potential risks from CWD to humans or non-cervid animals such as poultry and swine are not well understood. However, because of recent recognition that CWD is spreading rapidly in white-tailed deer, and because CWD’s route of transmission is poorly understood, FDA is making recommendations regarding the use in animal feed of rendered materials from deer and elk that are CWD-positive or that are at high risk for CWD.
 
II. Background
 
CWD is a neurological (brain) disease of farmed and wild deer and elk that belong in the animal family cervidae (cervids). Only deer and elk are known to be susceptible to CWD by natural transmission. The disease has been found in farmed and wild mule deer,
 
1 This guidance has been prepared by the Division of Animal Feeds in the Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) at the Food and Drug Administration.
 
1
 
CONTAINS NON-BINDING RECOMMENDATIONS
 
2
 
white-tailed deer, North American elk, and in farmed black-tailed deer. CWD belongs to a family of animal and human diseases called transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs). These include bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE or “mad cow” disease) in cattle; scrapie in sheep and goats; and classical and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob diseases (CJD and vCJD) in humans. There is no known treatment for these diseases, and there is no vaccine to prevent them. In addition, although validated postmortem diagnostic tests are available, there are no validated diagnostic tests for CWD that can be used to test for the disease in live animals.
 
III.
 
Use in animal feed of material from CWD-positive deer and elk
 
Material from CWD-positive animals may not be used in any animal feed or feed ingredients. Pursuant to Sec. 402(a)(5) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, animal feed and feed ingredients containing material from a CWD-positive animal would be considered adulterated. FDA recommends that any such adulterated feed or feed ingredients be recalled or otherwise removed from the marketplace.
 
IV.
 
Use in animal feed of material from deer and elk considered at high risk for CWD
 
Deer and elk considered at high risk for CWD include: (1) animals from areas declared by State officials to be endemic for CWD and/or to be CWD eradication zones; and (2) deer and elk that at some time during the 60-month period immediately before the time of slaughter were in a captive herd that contained a CWD-positive animal.
 
FDA recommends that materials from deer and elk considered at high risk for CWD no longer be entered into the animal feed system. Under present circumstances, FDA is not recommending that feed made from deer and elk from a non-endemic area be recalled if a State later declares the area endemic for CWD or a CWD eradication zone. In addition, at this time, FDA is not recommending that feed made from deer and elk believed to be from a captive herd that contained no CWD-positive animals be recalled if that herd is subsequently found to contain a CWD-positive animal. V. Use in animal feed of material from deer and elk NOT considered at high risk for CWD
 
FDA continues to consider materials from deer and elk NOT considered at high risk for CWD to be acceptable for use in NON-RUMINANT animal feeds in accordance with current agency regulations, 21 CFR 589.2000. Deer and elk not considered at high risk include: (1) deer and elk from areas not declared by State officials to be endemic for CWD and/or to be CWD eradication zones; and (2) deer and elk that were not at some time during the 60-month period immediately before the time of slaughter in a captive herd that contained a CWD-positive animal.
 
 
 
 
Thursday, November 28, 2013
 
Department of Justice Former Suppliers of Beef to National School Lunch Program Settle Allegations of Improper Practices and Mistreating Cows
 
 
 
 
 
that voluntary mad cow feed ban that became law, how did that work out for us $
 
 
Wednesday, October 30, 2013
 
SPECIFIED RISK MATERIAL (SRM) CONTROL VERIFICATION TASK FSIS NOTICE 70-13 10/30/13
 
 
 
 
Saturday, November 2, 2013
 
*** APHIS Finalizes Bovine Import Regulations in Line with International Animal Health Standards while enhancing the spread of BSE TSE prion mad cow type disease around the Globe
 
 
 
 
Friday, October 25, 2013
 
UK FSA TSE BSE Board meeting agenda: 5 November 2013
 
 
 
 
Thursday, June 6, 2013
 
FSA MORE BSE MAD COW CONTROL BREACHES JUNE 2013
 
 
 
 
Wednesday, September 25, 2013
 
Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations BSE TSE PRION 2013
 
 
 
 
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:16 AM
Subject: RE: Wasting disease is threat to the entire UK deer population
 
 
 
Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Corp ID for Signatures
 
Dear Mr Singeltary,
 
Thank you for your email, which was received by Public Information at the Scottish Parliament. We provide impartial information about the Scottish Parliament, its membership, business and procedures.
 
The Scottish Parliament’s Rural Affairs, Climate Change and Environment Committee has been looking into deer management, as you can see from the following press release, and your email has been forwarded to the committee for information:
 
 
You may be interested in following the committee’s work. Papers for committee meetings and transcripts of past meetings (called Official Reports) appear on the following webpage:
 
 
I hope this information is of use to you. Please contact us again if you have any questions about the Scottish Parliament.
 
Yours sincerely,
George Clark
Public Information and Publications
The Scottish Parliament
Description: Description: TwitterButtonJuly2012
Please note that any links to external websites are suggestions only.  The Scottish Parliament is not responsible for the content of external websites.
 
 
snip... my full submission here ;
 
 
Friday, November 22, 2013
 
Wasting disease is threat to the entire UK deer population (Chronic Wasting Disease CWD TSE prion disease aka Mad Deer Disease)
 

 
PRION2013 CONGRESSIONAL ABSTRACTS CWD
 
 
Sunday, August 25, 2013
 
***Chronic Wasting Disease CWD risk factors, ***humans***, domestic cats, blood, and mother to offspring transmission
 
 
 
 
Sunday, July 21, 2013
 
*** As Chronic Wasting Disease CWD rises in deer herd, what about risk for humans?
 
 
 
 
Thursday, December 05, 2013
 
National Scrapie Eradication Program October 2013 Monthly Report Fiscal Year 2014 TSE PRION REPORT
 
 
 
 
mad dogs and englishman
 
 
***2005***
 
DEFRA Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs
 
Area 307, London, SW1P 4PQ Telephone: 0207 904 6000 Direct line: 0207 904 6287 E-mail: h.mcdonagh.defra.gsi.gov.uk
 
GTN: FAX:
 
Mr T S Singeltary P.O. Box 42 Bacliff Texas USA 77518
 
21 November 2001
 
Dear Mr Singeltary
 
TSE IN HOUNDS
 
Thank you for e-mail regarding the hounds survey. I am sorry for the long delay in responding.
 
As you note, the hound survey remains unpublished. However the Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee (SEAC), the UK Government's independent Advisory Committee on all aspects related to BSE-like disease, gave the hound study detailed consideration at their meeting in January 1994. As a summary of this meeting published in the BSE inquiry noted, the Committee were clearly concerned about the work that had been carried out, concluding that there had clearly been problems with it, particularly the control on the histology, and that it was more or less inconclusive. However was agreed that there should be a re-evaluation of the pathological material in the study.
 
Later, at their meeting in June 95, The Committee re-evaluated the hound study to see if any useful results could be gained from it. The Chairman concluded that there were varying opinions within the Committee on further work. It did not suggest any further transmission studies and thought that the lack of clinical data was a major weakness.
 
Overall, it is clear that SEAC had major concerns about the survey as conducted. As a result it is likely that the authors felt that it would not stand up to r~eer review and hence it was never published. As noted above, and in the detailed minutes of the SEAC meeting in June 95, SEAC considered whether additional work should be performed to examine dogs for evidence of TSE infection. Although the Committee had mixed views about the merits of conducting further work, the Chairman noted that when the Southwood Committee made their recommendation to complete an assessment of possible spongiform disease in dogs, no TSEs had been identified in other species and hence dogs were perceived as a high risk population and worthy of study. However subsequent to the original recommendation, made in 1990, a number of other species had been identified with TSE ( e.g. cats) so a study in hounds was less
 
 
 
As this study remains unpublished, my understanding is that the ownership of the data essentially remains with the original researchers. Thus unfortunately, I am unable to help with your request to supply information on the hound survey directly. My only suggestion is that you contact one of the researchers originally involved in the project, such as Gerald Wells. He can be contacted at the following address.
 
Dr Gerald Wells, Veterinary Laboratories Agency, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey, KT 15 3NB, UK
 
You may also wish to be aware that since November 1994 all suspected cases of spongiform encephalopathy in animals and poultry were made notifiable. Hence since that date there has been a requirement for vets to report any suspect SE in dogs for further investigation. To date there has never been positive identification of a TSE in a dog.
 
I hope this is helpful
 
Yours sincerely 4
 
HUGH MCDONAGH BSE CORRESPONDENCE SECTION
 
======================================
 
HOUND SURVEY
 
I am sorry, but I really could have been a co-signatory of Gerald's minute.
 
I do NOT think that we can justify devoting any resources to this study, especially as larger and more important projects such as the pathogenesis study will be quite demanding.
 
If there is a POLITICAL need to continue with the examination of hound brains then it should be passed entirely to the VI Service.
 
J W WILESMITH Epidemiology Unit 18 October 1991
 
Mr. R Bradley
 
cc: Mr. G A H Wells
 
 
 
 
3.3. Mr R J Higgins in conjunction with Mr G A Wells and Mr A C Scott would by the end of the year, indentify the three brains that were from the ''POSITIVE'' end of the lesion spectrum.
 
 
 
 
Monday, March 26, 2012
 
CANINE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY: A NEW FORM OF ANIMAL PRION DISEASE
 
 
 
 
Friday, March 8, 2013
 
Dogs may have been used to make Petfood and animal feed
 
 
 
 
SEE FULL TEXT ;
 
 
 
 
Web posted Wednesday, February 18, 1998 2:02 p.m. CT
 
 
Graphic pictures greet Winfrey jury
 
 
By KAY LEDBETTER Globe-News Farm and Ranch Editor
 
Pictures of sheep heads, euthanized pets and roadkill greeted jurors this morning as they returned to the continuation of the cattlemen vs. Oprah Winfrey lawsuit.
 
The lawsuit continues today in U.S. District Mary Lou Robinson's court, but in a much diminished state.
 
 
snip...
 
 
Defense lawyer Charles Babcock called Van Smith, a City Paper reporter from Baltimore who had written an article on rendering plants in September 1995.
 
Smith and Babcock went through more than 50 pictures taken as the reporter toured the Valley Proteins plant in Baltimore and followed a rendering truck to the local animal shelter, a sausage plant and a slaughterhouse.
 
The pictures showed offal being emptied from the slaughterhouses. They showed animal shelter workers in the euthanasia room; barrels of dead animals in a refrigerated room at the animal shelter; waste meat from the sausage plant; and dead sheep from the slaughterhouse.
 
 
 
 
PET FOODS MAD CATS AND MAD DOGS BSE/TSEs
 
worse still, there is serious risk the media could get to hear of such a meeting...
 
snip...
 
Crushed heads (which inevitably involve brain and spinal cord material) are used to a limited extent but will also form one of the constituent raw materials of meat and bone meal, which is used extensively in pet food manufacturer...
 
 
 
 
 
snip...see full text ;
 
 
 
*** Tuesday, June 11, 2013
 
Weld County Bi-Products dba Fort Morgan Pet Foods 6/1/12 significant deviations from requirements in FDA regulations that are intended to reduce the risk of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) within the United States
 
 
 
 
Thursday, June 6, 2013
 
BSE TSE PRION USDA FDA MAD COW FEED COMPLIANCE REPORT and NAI, OAI, and VAI ratings as at June 5, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
Friday, March 8, 2013
 
Dogs may have been used to make Petfood and animal feed
 
 
 
SNIP... PLEASE SEE FULL TEXT SUBMISSION HERE ; re-Human Prion Diseases in the United States Posted by flounder on 01 Jan 2010 at 18:11 GMT I kindly disagree with your synopsis for the following reasons ;
 
 
 
 
 
CJD QUESTIONNAIRE USA
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Alzheimer's, _fast_ Alzhiemer's disease in the young ???
 
 
misdiagnosis there from, or some of the other neurodegenerative neurological disorders, might they be a prion disease, and might they be transmissible  $?$?$
 
 
pat, YOU know when I go quoting scriptures from the Bible, things must not be good...
 
 
Romans 12:19 ESV Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, “Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.”
 
 
 
 
 
Friday, March 8, 2013
 
Dogs may have been used to make Petfood and animal feed
 
 
 
 
and repay the Lord might just do, OR ALREADY HAS DONE ;
 
 
Tuesday, November 26, 2013
 
*** Transmission of multiple system atrophy prions to transgenic mice
 
 
 
 
 
see the rest of this nightmare below the studies.......
 
lost my mom to hvCJD, and have been following the TSE prion disease. I tried to tell them 10 years ago about this risk factors, there were studies back then. I DO NOT advertise on my blogs. they are for educational use...
 
 
Monday, December 02, 2013
 
*** A parliamentary inquiry has been launched today into the safety of blood, tissue and organ screening following fears that vCJD – the human form of ‘mad cow’ disease – may be being spread by medical procedures
 
 
 
Wednesday, December 11, 2013
 
*** Detection of Infectivity in Blood of Persons with Variant and Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease
 
 
 

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

NORDION (US), INC., AND BIOAXONE BIOSCIENCES, INC., Settles $90M Mad Cow TSE prion Contamination Suit Cethrin(R)

Case 0:12-cv-60739-RNS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/26/2012 Page 1 of 15
http://creutzfeldt-jakob-disease.blogspot.com/2013/09/nordion-us-inc-and-bioaxone-biosciences.html
 
 
Friday, August 16, 2013
 
*** Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) biannual update August 2013 U.K. and Contaminated blood products induce a highly atypical prion disease devoid of PrPres in primates
 
 
 
Sunday, August 11, 2013
 
Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease CJD cases rising North America updated report August 2013
 
*** Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease CJD cases rising North America with Canada seeing an extreme increase of 48% between 2008 and 2010
 
 
 

Sunday, October 13, 2013

CJD TSE Prion Disease Cases in Texas by Year, 2003-2012
http://creutzfeldt-jakob-disease.blogspot.com/2013/10/cjd-tse-prion-disease-cases-in-texas-by.html
 
 
 
 
Thursday, October 10, 2013
 
CJD REPORT 1994 increased risk for consumption of veal and venison and lamb
 
 
 
 
Published March 26, 2003
 
RE-Monitoring the occurrence of emerging forms of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in the United States
 
Terry S. Singeltary, retired (medically)
 
I lost my mother to hvCJD (Heidenhain Variant CJD). I would like to comment on the CDC's attempts to monitor the occurrence of emerging forms of CJD. Asante, Collinge et al [1] have reported that BSE transmission to the 129-methionine genotype can lead to an alternate phenotype that is indistinguishable from type 2 PrPSc, the commonest sporadic CJD. However, CJD and all human TSEs are not reportable nationally. CJD and all human TSEs must be made reportable in every state and internationally. I hope that the CDC does not continue to expect us to still believe that the 85%+ of all CJD cases which are sporadic are all spontaneous, without route/source. We have many TSEs in the USA in both animal and man. CWD in deer/elk is spreading rapidly and CWD does transmit to mink, ferret, cattle, and squirrel monkey by intracerebral inoculation. With the known incubation periods in other TSEs, oral transmission studies of CWD may take much longer. Every victim/family of CJD/TSEs should be asked about route and source of this agent. To prolong this will only spread the agent and needlessly expose others. In light of the findings of Asante and Collinge et al, there should be drastic measures to safeguard the medical and surgical arena from sporadic CJDs and all human TSEs. I only ponder how many sporadic CJDs in the USA are type 2 PrPSc?
 
Published March 26, 2003
 
 
 
 
 
Letters
 
JAMA. 2001;285(6):733-734. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.6.733
 
Diagnosis and Reporting of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease
 
Terry S. Singeltary, Sr Bacliff, Tex
 
Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text.
 
KEYWORDS: creutzfeldt-jakob disease, diagnosis. To the Editor: In their Research Letter, Dr Gibbons and colleagues1 reported that the annual US death rate due to Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) has been stable since 1985. These estimates, however, are based only on reported cases, and do not include misdiagnosed or preclinical cases. It seems to me that misdiagnosis alone would drastically change these figures. An unknown number of persons with a diagnosis of Alzheimer disease in fact may have CJD, although only a small number of these patients receive the postmortem examination necessary to make this diagnosis. Furthermore, only a few states have made CJD reportable. Human and animal transmissible spongiform encephalopathies should be reportable nationwide and internationally.
 
References 1. Gibbons RV, Holman RC, Belay ED, Schonberger LB. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in the United States: 1979-1998. JAMA. 2000;284:2322-2323.
 
 
 
 
just saying...
 
 
kindest regards,
terry
 
 
Terry S. Singeltary Sr.
P.O. Box 42
Bacliff, Texas USA 77518
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

No comments: